113-130
FINALUtah
Jazz
30-50|L10: 2-8
Chicago
Bulls
39-43|L10: 5-5
Utah Jazz
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61-18 | 0.772 | — | |
| 2 | 49-31 | 0.613 | 12.5 | |
| 3 | 46-32 | 0.590 | 14.5 | |
| 4 | 47-33 | 0.588 | 14.5 | |
| 5 | 46-33 | 0.582 | 15.0 | |
| 6 | 45-34 | 0.570 | 16.0 | |
| 7 | 45-36 | 0.556 | 17.0 | |
| 8 | 45-36 | 0.556 | 17.0 | |
| 9 | 38-42 | 0.475 | 23.5 | |
| 10 | 35-45 | 0.438 | 26.5 | |
| 11 | 49-107 | 0.314 | 50.5 | |
| 12 | 23-57 | 0.287 | 38.5 | |
| 13 | 15-64 | 0.190 | 46.0 | |
| 14 | 13-66 | 0.165 | 48.0 | |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 21.5 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/4 | L 95-123 | |
| 11/2 | L 113-115 | |
| 11/1 | W 133-109 | |
| 10/30 | L 102-110 | |
| 10/28 | L 104-126 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/4 | L 101-123 | |
| 11/3 | L 107-109 | |
| 11/1 | L 105-114 | |
| 10/30 | W 112-105 | |
| 10/28 | L 102-118 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | 48.0% | 39.5% | 82.0% | |
| 18.8 | 47.3% | 33.9% | 80.3% | |
| 17.1 | 38.9% | 25.8% | 71.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.0 | 48.4% | 28.4% | 85.0% | |
| 19.5 | 43.3% | 32.3% | 72.3% | |
| 19.3 | 44.9% | 35.0% | 67.6% |
| Category | CHI Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1992.3 ORtg | #29118.6 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #49.6% | #2811.4% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1935.8% | #2939.2% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #20113.8 DRtg | #2391.0 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #913.2% | #2711.7% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1636.2% | #2035.4% | UTA |