126-150
FINALChicago
Bulls
39-35|L10: 5-5
Minnesota
Timberwolves
39-42|L10: 5-5
Chicago Bulls
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51-21 | 0.708 | — | |
| 2 | 54-24 | 0.692 | — | |
| 3 | 48-26 | 0.649 | 4.0 | |
| 4 | 47-26 | 0.644 | 4.5 | |
| 5 | 43-33 | 0.566 | 10.0 | |
| 6 | 40-32 | 0.556 | 11.0 | |
| 7 | 38-34 | 0.528 | 13.0 | |
| 8 | 39-37 | 0.513 | 14.0 | |
| 9 | 37-37 | 0.500 | 15.0 | |
| 10 | 32-41 | 0.438 | 19.5 | |
| 11 | 61-81 | 0.430 | 25.0 | |
| 12 | 30-43 | 0.411 | 21.5 | |
| 13 | 29-45 | 0.392 | 23.0 | |
| 14 | 16-57 | 0.219 | 35.5 | |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 15.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/14 | L 120-128 | |
| 12/11 | L 122-123 | |
| 12/10 | W 144-115 | |
| 12/7 | W 115-111 | |
| 12/2 | L 111-119 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/14 | L 88-99 | |
| 12/12 | L 112-133 | |
| 12/10 | L 118-124 | |
| 12/9 | W 118-108 | |
| 12/7 | W 121-115 |
| Category | MIN Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #795.8 ORtg | #5110.6 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2912.3% | #713.9% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #737.1% | #1235.7% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #13112.2 DRtg | #696.7 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #514.1% | #1410.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2437.1% | #1635.9% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.7 | 48.1% | 34.7% | 81.9% | |
| 24.1 | 49.7% | 18.8% | 87.7% | |
| 17.9 | 53.5% | 32.0% | 52.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.2 | 45.5% | 35.8% | 70.9% | |
| 20.9 | 51.8% | 39.0% | 74.6% | |
| 18.1 | 46.7% | 37.5% | 61.7% |