106-127
FINALUtah
Jazz
30-50|L10: 2-8
Sacramento
Kings
45-35|L10: 4-6
Utah Jazz
Sacramento Kings
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55-24 | 0.696 | — | |
| 2 | 54-24 | 0.692 | 0.5 | |
| 3 | 55-26 | 0.679 | 1.0 | |
| 4 | 50-28 | 0.641 | 4.5 | |
| 5 | 49-31 | 0.613 | 6.5 | |
| 6 | 47-32 | 0.595 | 8.0 | |
| 7 | 47-32 | 0.595 | 8.0 | |
| 8 | 48-33 | 0.593 | 8.0 | |
| 9 | 44-34 | 0.564 | 10.5 | |
| 10 | 44-34 | 0.564 | 10.5 | |
| 11 | 41-39 | 0.512 | 14.5 | |
| 12 | 30-50 | 0.375 | 25.5 | |
| 13 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 29.5 | |
| 14 | 22-56 | 0.282 | 32.5 | |
| 15 | 21-60 | 0.259 | 35.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/29 | L 100-101 | |
| 3/27 | L 111-118 | |
| 3/25 | L 105-115 | |
| 3/23 | L 119-147 | |
| 3/21 | L 97-113 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/29 | L 103-107 | |
| 3/26 | L 96-132 | |
| 3/25 | W 108-96 | |
| 3/23 | W 109-107 | |
| 3/21 | L 102-109 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | 48.0% | 39.5% | 82.0% | |
| 18.8 | 47.3% | 33.9% | 80.3% | |
| 17.1 | 38.9% | 25.8% | 71.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.7 | 45.8% | 35.6% | 69.1% | |
| 19.3 | 59.4% | 26.5% | 67.1% | |
| 15.6 | 43.4% | 33.5% | 47.7% |
| Category | SAC Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1593.6 ORtg | #29118.6 DRtg | SAC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1410.3% | #2811.4% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1736.2% | #2939.2% | SAC |
| Category | SAC Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #18113.5 DRtg | #2391.0 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1013.1% | #2711.7% | SAC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2838.4% | #2035.4% | SAC |