Why did the Seahawks move on from Geno Smith for Sam Darnold? A June 2025 report cites leadership issues, not just performance. Get the real story here.
StatPro NFL Beat Reporter
Just when we thought the book was closed on one of the most surprising moves of the Seahawks' offseason, a new chapter has been opened. A report published Sunday by Rob Staton of Seahawks Draft Blog suggests the pivot from Geno Smith to Sam Darnold wasn't just about football—it was about leadership. This revelation adds a complex and fascinating layer to the team's new direction.
It wasn't just about finding a new quarterback; it was about finding a new leader for a new era.
According to Staton's June 8th report, leadership concerns were a significant factor in the front office's decision to move on from Smith, who had resurrected his career in Seattle. This wasn't a simple performance-based decision; it appears to be a foundational one. The team is clearly prioritizing a specific type of leadership and locker room presence that they believe Darnold provides. The financial commitment underscores the conviction behind the move. Eating $13.5 million in dead cap for Smith—a full 4.84% of the total cap—is a loud statement. It says the team felt the change was so necessary that they were willing to pay a premium for it, signaling a deliberate culture reset from the top down.
This report shifts the narrative significantly. The pressure is now squarely on Sam Darnold not just to perform, but to lead in the specific way the front office envisions. As we head towards training camp, all eyes will be on Darnold's command of the huddle and his presence in the locker room. The Seahawks didn't just bet on a new arm; they bet on a new voice to define their future. We'll soon see if that bet pays off.
