92-100
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
32-50|L10: 2-8
Brooklyn
Nets
47-47|L10: 5-5
Minnesota Timberwolves
Brooklyn Nets
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/29 | W 101-82 | |
| 12/27 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-51 | 0.407 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 15 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 12/26 | W 100-98 |
| 12/23 | W 78-71 |
| 12/22 | L 107-113 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/29 | W 91-81 | |
| 12/27 | L 71-96 | |
| 12/26 | L 91-92 | |
| 12/23 | L 104-115 | |
| 12/22 | L 95-99 |
| Category | BKN Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2782.1 ORtg | #21106.2 DRtg | BKN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #29100.0% | #2714.6% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #290.0% | #1035.1% | MIN |
| Category | BKN Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #30876.0 DRtg | #1983.9 ORtg | BKN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1100.0% | #2113.0% | BKN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #10.0% | #1435.2% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.4 | 48.0% | 7.9% | 83.0% | |
| 17.0 | 44.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.1 |
| 36.1% |
| 66.5% |
| 12.3 | 49.8% | 7.7% | 53.1% |
| 56.6% |
| 45.0% |
| 75.0% |
| 17.0 | 75.0% | 50.0% | 58.3% |
Nenad Krstić | 16.4 | - | - | - |