102-96
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
32-50|L10: 2-8
Charlotte
Hornets
114-137|L10: 5-5
Minnesota Timberwolves
Charlotte Hornets
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/30 | L 92-100 | |
| 12/29 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 48-33 | 0.593 | 4.5 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-37 | 0.543 | 8.5 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 108-131 | 0.452 | 23.5 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 13 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 12.0 |
| 12/27 | L 97-100 |
| 12/26 | W 100-98 |
| 12/23 | W 78-71 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/30 | W 113-102 | |
| 12/30 | W 100-92 | |
| 12/30 | L 80-94 | |
| 12/29 | W 91-81 | |
| 12/29 | W 99-89 |
| Category | CHA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2482.0 ORtg | #21106.2 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1012.2% | #2414.6% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1335.3% | #835.1% | MIN |
| Category | CHA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #16105.4 DRtg | #1783.9 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #516.2% | #2113.0% | CHA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1936.3% | #1435.2% | CHA |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.4 | 47.9% | 10.5% | 81.7% | |
| 17.0 | 45.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.1 |
| 34.6% |
| 66.7% |
| 12.3 | 50.6% | 7.1% | 53.9% |
| 49.2% |
| 20.6% |
| 66.2% |
| 14.4 | 52.4% | 0.0% | 55.9% |
| 14.0 | 38.6% | 32.1% | 59.9% |