98-103
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
51-35|L10: 4-6
Charlotte
Hornets
50-36|L10: 7-3
Minnesota Timberwolves
Charlotte Hornets
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56-26 | 0.683 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/14 | L 94-105 | |
| 12/11 |
| — |
| 2 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 7.0 |
| 5 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 7.0 |
| 6 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 11.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 15.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 21.0 |
| 11 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 24.0 |
| 12 | 31-51 | 0.378 | 25.0 |
| 13 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 39.0 |
| 12/9 | L 86-90 |
| 12/8 | L 94-110 |
| 12/4 | L 84-103 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/11 | W 106-84 | |
| 12/10 | W 106-99 | |
| 12/8 | W 113-106 | |
| 12/5 | W 103-81 | |
| 12/3 | W 113-94 |
| Category | CHA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1083.2 ORtg | #13102.0 DRtg | CHA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1111.8% | #1614.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2233.3% | #1435.6% | MIN |
| Category | CHA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #8100.4 DRtg | #783.9 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1914.5% | #511.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2740.0% | #737.6% | CHA |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.7 | 50.7% | 21.7% | 62.8% | |
| 17.2 | 49.8% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.9 |
| 37.2% |
| 70.3% |
| 11.4 | 45.5% | 14.3% | 56.6% |
| 42.2% |
| 35.4% |
| 84.3% |
| 16.9 | 46.1% | 34.0% | 71.8% |
| 13.6 | 37.1% | 18.3% | 15.0% |