88-83
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
26-40|L10: 1-9
Charlotte
Hornets
45-146|L10: 1-9
Minnesota Timberwolves
Charlotte Hornets
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-16 | 0.758 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/27 | L 86-93 | |
| 3/25 |
| — |
| 2 | 46-20 | 0.697 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 42-24 | 0.636 | 8.0 |
| 4 | 39-27 | 0.591 | 11.0 |
| 5 | 39-27 | 0.591 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 37-29 | 0.561 | 13.0 |
| 7 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 35-31 | 0.530 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 31-35 | 0.470 | 19.0 |
| 10 | 25-41 | 0.379 | 25.0 |
| 11 | 23-43 | 0.348 | 27.0 |
| 12 | 21-45 | 0.318 | 29.0 |
| 13 | 20-46 | 0.303 | 30.0 |
| 14 | 45-146 | 0.236 | 67.5 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 17.0 |
| 3/23 | L 140-149 |
| 3/21 | L 100-116 |
| 3/19 | W 97-93 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/26 | L 84-105 | |
| 3/26 | L 95-102 | |
| 3/26 | L 85-97 | |
| 3/24 | L 86-89 | |
| 3/24 | W 102-89 |
| Category | CHA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #190.3 ORtg | #19104.5 DRtg | CHA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #711.5% | #2513.3% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1434.6% | #633.9% | MIN |
| Category | CHA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #28108.7 DRtg | #1881.7 ORtg | CHA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2712.3% | #2112.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2737.1% | #2133.4% | CHA |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.0 | 43.9% | 32.8% | 81.2% | |
| 14.5 | 58.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15.1 |
| 0.0% |
| 64.8% |
| 12.1 | 43.0% | 26.0% | 68.7% |
| 44.9% |
| 10.9% |
| 66.0% |
| 15.0 | 35.0% | 29.2% | 76.8% |
| 12.1 | 36.1% | 28.3% | 58.9% |