82-103
FINALMiami
Heat
72-31|L10: 6-4
Chicago
Bulls
71-27|L10: 5-5
Miami Heat
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62-20 | 0.756 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 5/11 | W 97-87 | |
| 5/9 |
| 58-24 |
| 0.707 |
| 4.0 |
| 3 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 10.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 18.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 20.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 21.0 |
| 8 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 25.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 27.0 |
| 10 | 37-51 | 0.420 | 28.0 |
| 11 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 32.0 |
| 12 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 38.0 |
| 13 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 39.0 |
| 14 | 22-61 | 0.265 | 40.5 |
| 15 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 43.0 |
| 5/7 | L 81-97 |
| 5/3 | W 102-91 |
| 5/1 | W 99-90 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 5/12 | W 93-73 | |
| 5/10 | W 95-83 | |
| 5/8 | L 88-100 | |
| 5/6 | W 99-82 | |
| 5/4 | W 86-73 |
| Category | CHI Offense | MIA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2383.9 ORtg | #7104.0 DRtg | MIA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1111.5% | #2913.6% | MIA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1535.6% | #1836.1% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | MIA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #198.6 DRtg | #591.2 ORtg | MIA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1314.6% | #2012.1% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #433.2% | #1036.5% | MIA |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 26.1 | 47.5% | 27.0% | 77.1% |
| 25.3 | 48.9% | 20.8% | 74.8% |
| 18.7 | 48.6% | 4.8% | 79.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.4 | 44.2% | 29.8% | 81.5% | |
| 17.3 | 45.3% | 32.8% | 69.8% | |
| 16.5 | 48.3% | 0.0% | 59.8% |