113-100
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
53-35|L10: 5-5
Chicago
Bulls
30-52|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-32 | 0.610 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/21 | W 98-86 | |
| 12/20 |
| — |
| 2 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 4-4 | 0.500 | 9.0 |
| 9 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 15.0 |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 26.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 33.0 |
| 12/18 | L 94-99 |
| 12/17 | W 96-80 |
| 12/14 | L 92-98 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/23 | L 83-99 | |
| 12/21 | W 110-103 | |
| 12/20 | L 86-101 | |
| 12/18 | W 96-83 | |
| 12/16 | W 94-83 |
| Category | CHI Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2179.2 ORtg | #15101.7 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2313.1% | #2613.5% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #835.6% | #1434.9% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #20104.1 DRtg | #583.7 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1714.8% | #611.4% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #232.2% | #536.2% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | 50.9% | 14.1% | 70.5% | |
| 17.2 | 48.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.1 |
| 37.9% |
| 75.3% |
| 15.0 | 41.2% | 32.4% | 69.7% |
| 40.7% |
| 37.3% |
| 82.6% |
| 13.5 | 45.5% | 20.6% | 59.5% |
| 11.7 | 40.6% | 3.0% | 60.7% |