131-139
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
44-45|L10: 5-5
Chicago
Bulls
41-43|L10: 5-5
Minnesota Timberwolves
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58-24 | 0.707 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/15 | L 102-104 | |
| 3/13 |
| — |
| 2 | 57-25 | 0.695 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 7.0 |
| 5 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 13.0 |
| 7 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 9 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 10 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 23.0 |
| 12 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 23.0 |
| 13 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 24.0 |
| 14 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 31.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 41.0 |
| 3/10 | L 123-124 |
| 3/7 | L 94-117 |
| 3/4 | W 138-134 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/15 | L 114-117 | |
| 3/11 | W 119-111 | |
| 3/8 | W 117-96 | |
| 3/5 | L 122-125 | |
| 3/3 | L 104-125 |
| Category | CHI Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2108.3 ORtg | #11121.3 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1812.2% | #815.4% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1635.9% | #2537.1% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #19124.0 DRtg | #12103.9 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #515.7% | #2913.4% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1335.7% | #737.1% | CHI |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.8 | 45.7% | 34.2% | 72.9% | |
| 20.7 | 49.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.9 | 47.0% |
| 65.4% |
| 17.9 | 47.4% | 41.2% | 64.3% |
| 31.5% |
| 82.2% |
| 24.5 | 46.5% | 15.1% | 89.4% |
| 17.5 | 52.0% | 21.3% | 47.5% |