91-81
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
32-50|L10: 2-8
Chicago
Bulls
55-37|L10: 6-4
Minnesota Timberwolves
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/8 | W 110-103 | |
| 12/6 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-51 | 0.407 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 15 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 12/3 | W 95-84 |
| 12/1 | L 92-106 |
| 11/28 | L 75-82 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/8 | W 93-90 | |
| 12/6 | W 121-94 | |
| 12/4 | W 100-82 | |
| 12/2 | W 112-94 | |
| 12/1 | W 111-108 |
| Category | CHI Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2183.0 ORtg | #21106.2 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2012.9% |
MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #338.1% | #1035.1% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #299.0 DRtg | #1983.9 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #417.3% | #2113.0% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #935.1% | #1435.2% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.4 | 48.0% | 7.9% | 83.0% | |
| 17.0 | 44.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.3 |
| 36.1% |
| 66.5% |
| 12.3 | 49.8% | 7.7% | 53.1% |
| 43.8% |
| 36.4% |
| 80.1% |
| 19.2 | 51.1% | 1.2% | 76.3% |
| 16.1 | 43.0% | 39.3% | 63.9% |