106-86
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
51-35|L10: 4-6
Chicago
Bulls
17-65|L10: 3-7
Minnesota Timberwolves
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56-26 | 0.683 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/20 | W 100-94 | |
| 12/18 |
| — |
| 2 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 7.0 |
| 5 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 7.0 |
| 6 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 11.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 15.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 21.0 |
| 11 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 24.0 |
| 12 | 31-51 | 0.378 | 25.0 |
| 13 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 39.0 |
| 12/17 | L 88-97 |
| 12/15 | L 98-103 |
| 12/14 | L 94-105 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/20 | L 84-93 | |
| 12/18 | L 74-83 | |
| 12/17 | L 74-77 | |
| 12/15 | L 91-102 | |
| 12/11 | L 87-108 |
| Category | CHI Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2773.5 ORtg | #13102.0 DRtg | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2715.5% | #1614.8% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2333.0% | #1435.6% | MIN |
| Category | CHI Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #12101.8 DRtg | #783.9 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1115.9% | #511.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #633.2% | #737.6% | Even |
| 22.7 | 50.7% | 21.7% | 62.8% | |
| 17.2 | 49.8% | 37.2% | 70.3% | |
| 11.4 | 45.5% | 14.3% | 56.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.1 | 50.0% | 0.0% | 68.6% | |
| 18.4 | 38.6% | 21.8% | 64.6% | |
Toni Kukoč | 18.0 | - | - | - |