123-125
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
60-42|L10: 5-5
Chicago
Bulls
42-46|L10: 6-4
Minnesota Timberwolves
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65-22 | 0.747 | — | |
| 2 | 64-22 | 0.744 | 0.5 | |
| 3 | 55-32 | 0.632 | 10.0 | |
| 4 | 52-34 | 0.605 | 12.5 | |
| 5 | 50-37 | 0.575 | 15.0 | |
| 6 | 47-40 | 0.540 | 18.0 | |
| 7 | 42-43 | 0.494 | 22.0 | |
| 8 | 42-45 | 0.483 | 23.0 | |
| 9 | 41-45 | 0.477 | 23.5 | |
| 10 | 41-46 | 0.471 | 24.0 | |
| 11 | 33-54 | 0.379 | 32.0 | |
| 12 | 27-59 | 0.314 | 37.5 | |
| 13 | 26-61 | 0.299 | 39.0 | |
| 14 | 21-66 | 0.241 | 44.0 | |
| 15 | 20-67 | 0.230 | 45.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/13 | L 110-115 | |
| 10/11 | W 121-111 | |
| 10/4 | W 124-107 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/14 | L 107-111 | |
| 10/12 | L 121-124 | |
| 10/8 | W 116-112 |
| Category | CHI Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1193.9 ORtg | #8109.8 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1611.2% | #914.0% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1036.6% | #1135.6% | Even |
| Category | CHI Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #18112.6 DRtg | #1393.0 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2911.4% | #2011.4% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #133.9% | #437.4% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.0 | 44.8% | 38.1% | 75.5% | |
| 19.1 | 48.0% | 30.9% | 74.2% | |
| 13.7 | 46.7% | 36.6% | 49.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.5 | 49.9% | 43.3% | 71.3% | |
| 20.3 | 44.6% | 36.6% | 81.5% | |
| 18.2 | 53.5% | 39.9% | 52.5% |