93-104
FINALNew
Orleans Pelicans
39-43|L10: 7-3
Chicago
Bulls
55-37|L10: 6-4
New Orleans Pelicans
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/28 | W 107-100 | |
| 2/27 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-51 | 0.407 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 13 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 15 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 2/23 | W 98-97 |
| 2/21 | W 111-107 |
| 2/20 | L 100-104 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/28 | W 113-83 | |
| 2/26 | L 87-94 | |
| 2/25 | L 93-95 | |
| 2/23 | W 105-90 | |
| 2/22 | W 84-78 |
| Category | CHI Offense | NOP Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2183.0 ORtg | #29782.1 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2012.9% | #2100.0% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #338.1% | #20.0% | Even |
| Category | CHI Defense | NOP Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #299.0 DRtg | #1876.0 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #417.3% | #30100.0% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #935.1% | #300.0% | NOP |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.3 | - | - | - | |
Peja Stojaković | 17.8 | - | - | - |
| 17.3 | - | - | - |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.3 |
| 43.8% |
| 36.4% |
| 80.1% |
| 19.2 | 51.1% | 1.2% | 76.3% |
| 16.1 | 43.0% | 39.3% | 63.9% |