112-128
FINALNew
Orleans Pelicans
40-50|L10: 4-6
Chicago
Bulls
47-40|L10: 2-8
New Orleans Pelicans
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/20 | L 97-117 |
| — |
| 2 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 2.0 |
| 3 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 46-36 | 0.561 | 7.0 |
| 7 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 8 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 9 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 10.0 |
| 10 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 10.0 |
| 11 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 16.0 |
| 12 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 28.0 |
| 14 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 30.0 |
| 15 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 31.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/20 | W 94-88 |
| Category | CHI Offense | NOP Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #3101.9 ORtg | #21120.5 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1111.2% | #814.5% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #736.6% | #2136.0% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | NOP Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #19120.3 DRtg | #2196.4 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1913.6% | #1611.7% | NOP |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2736.7% | #2633.6% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.0 | 45.4% | 36.3% | 59.5% | |
| 23.3 | 48.5% | 32.9% | 80.9% | |
| 17.5 | 53.6% | 25.9% | 64.1% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.4 | 49.5% |
| 23.7% |
| 80.5% |
| 24.5 | 48.1% | 39.2% | 87.0% |
| 17.8 | 49.1% | 29.1% | 38.0% |