118-134
FINALNew
Orleans Pelicans
21-47|L10: 6-4
Chicago
Bulls
29-40|L10: 2-8
New Orleans Pelicans
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 47-20 | 0.701 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/29 | L 125-130 | |
| 12/27 |
| — |
| 2 | 46-22 | 0.676 | 1.5 |
| 3 | 46-25 | 0.648 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 40-28 | 0.588 | 7.5 |
| 5 | 39-28 | 0.582 | 8.0 |
| 6 | 39-29 | 0.574 | 8.5 |
| 7 | 35-32 | 0.522 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 35-33 | 0.515 | 12.5 |
| 9 | 36-35 | 0.507 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 34-36 | 0.486 | 14.5 |
| 11 | 30-37 | 0.448 | 17.0 |
| 12 | 29-40 | 0.420 | 19.0 |
| 13 | 17-48 | 0.262 | 29.0 |
| 14 | 17-49 | 0.258 | 29.5 |
| 15 | 17-51 | 0.250 | 30.5 |
| 12/26 | L 108-115 |
| 12/23 | L 118-141 |
| 12/22 | W 119-113 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/29 | L 101-136 | |
| 12/27 | L 103-112 | |
| 12/26 | W 109-102 | |
| 12/23 | W 126-123 | |
| 12/21 | W 152-150 |
| Category | CHI Offense | NOP Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #993.2 ORtg | #27116.5 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2211.9% | #1613.7% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #836.1% | #935.1% | Even |
| Category | CHI Defense | NOP Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #22114.3 DRtg | #2290.3 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2911.8% | #710.7% | NOP |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2936.9% | #2734.1% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.7 | 47.0% | 37.5% | 69.1% | |
| 21.3 | 58.7% | 2.0% | 67.5% | |
| 17.4 | 44.0% | 31.9% | 73.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.6 | 41.3% |
| 30.8% |
| 73.4% |
| 17.3 | 44.1% | 31.9% | 77.0% |
| 16.2 | 47.8% | 35.0% | 63.2% |