125-120
FINALNew
Orleans Pelicans
33-49|L10: 3-7
Chicago
Bulls
21-61|L10: 2-8
New Orleans Pelicans
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60-22 | 0.732 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/4 | L 107-109 | |
| 2/2 |
| — |
| 2 | 58-24 | 0.707 | 2.0 |
| 3 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 11.0 |
| 5 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 12.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 18.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 18.0 |
| 8 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 19.0 |
| 9 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 21.0 |
| 10 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 21.0 |
| 11 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 28.0 |
| 12 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 31.0 |
| 13 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 38.0 |
| 14 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 41.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 43.0 |
| 1/30 | L 99-105 |
| 1/29 | W 121-116 |
| 1/26 | L 114-126 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/2 | L 118-125 | |
| 1/30 | W 105-89 | |
| 1/29 | L 117-122 | |
| 1/27 | L 101-104 | |
| 1/25 | L 101-106 |
| Category | CHI Offense | NOP Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2189.0 ORtg | #24112.1 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2111.5% | #2012.5% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1735.0% | #2136.0% | CHI |
| Category | CHI Defense | NOP Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #27113.0 DRtg | #1191.0 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1512.9% | #2211.5% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2536.9% | #2434.3% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 25.9 | 53.8% | 23.5% | 77.2% |
| 21.4 | 53.5% | 24.5% | 67.6% |
| 21.2 | 47.2% | 30.2% | 67.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.7 | 48.3% | 34.3% | 84.0% | |
| 20.0 | 56.0% | 47.5% | 79.8% | |
| 18.7 | 45.9% | 42.8% | 70.9% |