101-94
FINALOklahoma
City Thunder
40-42|L10: 5-5
Chicago
Bulls
30-52|L10: 4-6
Oklahoma City Thunder
Chicago Bulls
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-32 | 0.610 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/31 | W 119-98 | |
| 3/29 | W 95-71 |
| — |
| 2 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 6.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 15.0 |
| 11 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 25.0 |
| 13 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 26.0 |
| 14 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 33.0 |
| 3/27 | L 74-80 |
| 3/25 | W 82-73 |
| 3/22 | W 101-99 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/30 | L 92-107 | |
| 3/29 | L 89-140 | |
| 3/27 | W 82-74 | |
| 3/23 | L 82-105 | |
| 3/23 | W 100-98 |
| Category | CHI Offense | OKC Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2479.4 ORtg | #12107.2 DRtg | OKC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2313.6% | #1416.4% | CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1035.4% | #833.6% | Even |
| Category | CHI Defense | OKC Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #22112.9 DRtg | #1881.7 ORtg | CHI |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1816.1% | #311.1% | OKC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #232.2% | #935.5% | OKC |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.5 | 45.5% | 31.6% | 82.5% | |
| 20.8 | 45.3% | 23.5% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.1 |
| 64.6% |
| 18.1 | 45.7% | 34.1% | 74.1% |
| 38.9% |
| 33.6% |
| 81.6% |
| 13.5 | 46.7% | 20.5% | 62.0% |
| 11.7 | 44.4% | 3.7% | 64.9% |