126-118
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
48-39|L10: 4-6
LA
Clippers
43-40|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
LA Clippers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65-17 | 0.793 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/20 | W 115-109 | |
| 1/18 |
| 58-24 |
| 0.707 |
| 7.0 |
| 3 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 16.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 17.0 |
| 5 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 17.0 |
| 6 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 17.0 |
| 7 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 18.0 |
| 8 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 18.0 |
| 9 | 46-36 | 0.561 | 19.0 |
| 10 | 43-40 | 0.518 | 22.5 |
| 11 | 35-48 | 0.422 | 30.5 |
| 12 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 38.0 |
| 13 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 41.0 |
| 14 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 43.0 |
| 15 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 44.0 |
| 1/16 | L 102-108 |
| 1/14 | W 120-103 |
| 1/12 | W 118-108 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/20 | L 113-125 | |
| 1/17 | W 109-104 | |
| 1/15 | W 113-102 | |
| 1/13 | W 126-105 | |
| 1/11 | W 121-115 |
| Category | LAC Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #995.1 ORtg | #23113.0 DRtg | LAC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2112.3% | #1014.7% | LAC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2435.2% | #1736.5% | MIN |
| Category | LAC Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #26114.3 DRtg | #895.6 ORtg | LAC |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1414.2% | #110.4% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1235.9% | #1036.4% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.7 | 47.2% | 35.4% | 76.6% | |
| 20.9 | 52.3% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.6 |
| 76.3% |
| 17.6 | 43.8% | 29.5% | 53.6% |
| 44.4% |
| 31.8% |
| 78.2% |
| 22.6 | 43.1% | 33.5% | 84.7% |
| 19.3 | 47.4% | 41.0% | 59.6% |