95-111
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
31-50|L10: 5-5
LA
Clippers
57-30|L10: 6-4
Minnesota Timberwolves
LA Clippers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60-22 | 0.732 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/9 | L 89-105 | |
| 4/6 |
| 57-24 |
| 0.704 |
| 2.5 |
| 3 | 57-24 | 0.704 | 2.5 |
| 4 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 55-26 | 0.679 | 4.5 |
| 6 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 13.0 |
| 7 | 45-36 | 0.556 | 14.5 |
| 8 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 42-39 | 0.519 | 17.5 |
| 10 | 40-41 | 0.494 | 19.5 |
| 11 | 33-48 | 0.407 | 26.5 |
| 12 | 31-50 | 0.383 | 28.5 |
| 13 | 28-53 | 0.346 | 31.5 |
| 14 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 35.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 19.0 |
| 4/5 | L 93-95 |
| 4/3 | W 107-98 |
| 4/1 | W 110-100 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/7 | W 109-95 | |
| 4/3 | W 126-101 | |
| 4/1 | L 106-109 | |
| 3/30 | L 81-98 | |
| 3/29 | L 102-104 |
| Category | LAC Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #787.1 ORtg | #15103.5 DRtg | LAC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1011.8% | #216.1% | LAC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1735.1% | #2236.9% | LAC |
| Category | LAC Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #8102.5 DRtg | #2380.2 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #316.1% | #1311.9% | LAC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2437.4% | #2830.4% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 18.3 | 33.6% | 17.6% | 70.0% | |
| 16.3 | 50.3% | 0.0% | 69.9% | |
| 12.4 | 49.0% | 26.7% | 60.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.6 | 52.7% | 4.5% | 64.1% | |
| 17.5 | 47.8% | 31.0% | 81.1% | |
| 16.1 | 42.8% | 35.2% | 69.6% |