91-120
FINALMemphis
Grizzlies
32-31|L10: 4-6
Los
Angeles Lakers
45-14|L10: 8-2
Memphis Grizzlies
Los Angeles Lakers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 45-14 | 0.763 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/27 | W 134-133 | |
| 10/25 |
| 40-19 |
| 0.678 |
| 5.0 |
| 3 | 39-21 | 0.650 | 6.5 |
| 4 | 39-21 | 0.650 | 6.5 |
| 5 | 38-21 | 0.644 | 7.0 |
| 6 | 37-21 | 0.638 | 7.5 |
| 7 | 35-27 | 0.565 | 11.5 |
| 8 | 32-31 | 0.508 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 28-34 | 0.452 | 18.5 |
| 10 | 26-32 | 0.448 | 18.5 |
| 11 | 26-33 | 0.441 | 19.0 |
| 12 | 27-35 | 0.435 | 19.5 |
| 13 | 25-36 | 0.410 | 21.0 |
| 14 | 17-43 | 0.283 | 28.5 |
| 15 | 15-46 | 0.246 | 31.0 |
| 10/23 | L 101-120 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/27 | W 120-101 | |
| 10/25 | W 95-86 | |
| 10/22 | L 102-112 |
| Category | LAL Offense | MEM Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1591.3 ORtg | #13108.3 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2211.9% |
LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2434.6% | #2136.6% | MEM |
| Category | LAL Defense | MEM Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #2103.1 DRtg | #2089.6 ORtg | MEM |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #514.7% | #1911.8% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #133.5% | #2234.7% | MEM |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17.6 | 48.8% | 29.4% | 69.8% | |
| 16.7 | 45.2% | 36.2% | 54.0% | |
| 15.9 | 38.4% | 35.3% | 63.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.9 |
| 26.4% |
| 81.8% |
| 25.9 | 49.6% | 32.2% | 68.3% |
| 12.1 | 41.2% | 25.5% | 47.9% |