110-128
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
42-31|L10: 6-4
Los
Angeles Lakers
44-30|L10: 9-1
Minnesota Timberwolves
Los Angeles Lakers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57-17 | 0.770 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/22 | W 118-114 | |
| 10/17 |
| 54-19 |
| 0.740 |
| 2.5 |
| 3 | 44-27 | 0.620 | 11.5 |
| 4 | 44-29 | 0.603 | 12.5 |
| 5 | 44-30 | 0.595 | 13.0 |
| 6 | 42-30 | 0.583 | 14.0 |
| 7 | 42-31 | 0.575 | 14.5 |
| 8 | 37-34 | 0.521 | 18.5 |
| 9 | 36-37 | 0.493 | 20.5 |
| 10 | 34-39 | 0.466 | 22.5 |
| 11 | 26-47 | 0.356 | 30.5 |
| 12 | 24-48 | 0.333 | 32.0 |
| 13 | 23-48 | 0.324 | 32.5 |
| 14 | 21-51 | 0.292 | 35.0 |
| 15 | 19-54 | 0.260 | 37.5 |
| 10/16 | L 120-126 |
| 10/9 | L 95-100 |
| 10/7 | L 134-135 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10/21 | L 109-119 | |
| 10/17 | L 116-117 | |
| 10/15 | L 94-121 | |
| 10/14 | L 104-113 | |
| 10/12 | W 126-116 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29.4 | 48.5% | 39.3% | 76.1% | |
| 21.0 | 47.3% | 27.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.7 | 47.2% |
| 79.5% |
| 14.2 | 50.4% | 42.7% | 60.1% |
| 36.3% |
| 76.0% |
| 23.4 | 49.3% | 35.1% | 84.9% |
| 21.2 | 50.8% | 30.7% | 71.6% |
| Category | LAL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #496.4 ORtg | #11111.3 DRtg | LAL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2512.0% | #1513.9% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1835.5% | #1835.8% | Even |
| Category | LAL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #20113.6 DRtg | #794.4 ORtg | LAL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1314.2% | #1911.7% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1535.6% | #337.5% | LAL |