102-108
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
39-42|L10: 5-5
Los
Angeles Lakers
47-42|L10: 4-6
Minnesota Timberwolves
Los Angeles Lakers
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 48-25 | 0.658 | — | |
| 2 | 45-30 | 0.600 | 4.0 | |
| 3 | 44-31 | 0.587 | 5.0 | |
| 4 | 42-34 | 0.553 | 7.5 | |
| 5 | 39-34 | 0.534 | 9.0 | |
| 6 | 38-34 | 0.528 | 9.5 | |
| 7 | 37-36 | 0.507 | 11.0 | |
| 8 | 37-36 | 0.507 | 11.0 | |
| 9 | 37-37 | 0.500 | 11.5 | |
| 10 | 36-38 | 0.486 | 12.5 | |
| 11 | 36-40 | 0.474 | 13.5 | |
| 12 | 34-40 | 0.459 | 14.5 | |
| 13 | 27-45 | 0.375 | 20.5 | |
| 14 | 21-53 | 0.284 | 27.5 | |
| 15 | 20-56 | 0.263 | 29.5 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/9 | W 113-108 | |
| 4/8 | W 151-131 | |
| 4/4 | W 107-102 | |
| 4/2 | L 105-107 | |
| 3/29 | L 100-107 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 4/9 | W 128-117 | |
| 4/7 | W 121-107 | |
| 4/5 | L 118-125 | |
| 4/4 | W 135-133 | |
| 4/2 | W 134-109 |
| Category | LAL Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1095.0 ORtg | #13112.2 DRtg | LAL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #910.5% | #514.1% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2534.5% | #2437.1% | Even |
| Category | LAL Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #11111.7 DRtg | #795.8 ORtg | LAL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2611.7% | #2912.3% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #334.5% | #737.1% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.2 | 45.5% | 35.8% | 70.9% | |
| 20.9 | 51.8% | 39.0% | 74.6% | |
| 18.1 | 46.7% | 37.5% | 61.7% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.4 | 50.7% | 30.0% | 72.7% | |
| 24.6 | 53.8% | 14.0% | 76.6% | |
| 16.1 | 41.2% | 26.0% | 59.2% |