103-104
FINALChicago
Bulls
54-37|L10: 6-4
Memphis
Grizzlies
22-60|L10: 4-6
Chicago Bulls
Memphis Grizzlies
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/14 | W 88-87 | |
| 3/13 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 48-33 | 0.593 | 4.5 |
| 4 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 6.0 |
| 5 | 44-37 | 0.543 | 8.5 |
| 6 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 108-131 | 0.452 | 23.5 |
| 9 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 23.0 |
| 13 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 29.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 12.0 |
| 3/11 | W 94-78 |
| 3/8 | W 100-76 |
| 3/7 | L 70-103 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/14 | L 96-118 | |
| 3/12 | L 102-113 | |
| 3/10 | W 115-107 | |
| 3/9 | L 105-106 | |
| 3/7 | L 87-94 |
| Category | MEM Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #686.1 ORtg | #298.4 DRtg | CHI |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2513.4% | #217.1% | MEM |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #736.6% | #735.1% | Even |
| Category | MEM Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #28110.1 DRtg | #2382.0 ORtg | MEM |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1615.3% | #1912.8% | MEM |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2838.7% | #338.1% | MEM |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.4 | 44.1% | 37.4% | 79.4% | |
| 19.2 | 51.2% | 1.1% | 74.6% | |
| 16.0 | 43.1% | 39.8% | 64.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.8 | 53.8% |
| 3.4% |
| 76.2% |
| 18.5 | 44.8% | 37.1% | 62.5% |
| 13.5 | 42.5% | 34.2% | 65.5% |