124-125
FINALChicago
Bulls
34-53|L10: 2-8
Memphis
Grizzlies
26-61|L10: 1-9
Chicago Bulls
Memphis Grizzlies
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62-24 | 0.721 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/27 | L 113-131 | |
| 3/25 |
| — |
| 2 | 59-27 | 0.686 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 58-30 | 0.659 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 53-33 | 0.616 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 49-37 | 0.570 | 13.0 |
| 6 | 49-38 | 0.563 | 13.5 |
| 7 | 48-38 | 0.558 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 46-40 | 0.535 | 16.0 |
| 9 | 46-41 | 0.529 | 16.5 |
| 10 | 43-45 | 0.489 | 20.0 |
| 11 | 35-51 | 0.407 | 27.0 |
| 12 | 34-53 | 0.391 | 28.5 |
| 13 | 21-64 | 0.247 | 40.5 |
| 14 | 21-65 | 0.244 | 41.0 |
| 15 | 18-66 | 0.214 | 43.0 |
| 3/23 | W 132-124 |
| 3/19 | L 110-115 |
| 3/18 | L 109-139 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/27 | L 109-119 | |
| 3/25 | L 98-123 | |
| 3/23 | L 107-146 | |
| 3/21 | L 101-124 | |
| 3/20 | L 112-117 |
| Category | MEM Offense | CHI Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2091.0 ORtg | #22114.7 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2211.8% |
CHI |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1335.9% | #2536.8% | MEM |
| Category | MEM Defense | CHI Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #23115.5 DRtg | #1092.7 ORtg | MEM |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #914.6% | #2412.0% | MEM |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2136.2% | #1835.6% | MEM |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.6 | 41.3% | 30.8% | 73.4% | |
| 16.8 | 47.1% | 35.0% | 76.0% | |
| 16.8 | 43.6% | 32.3% | 72.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.4 | 43.1% |
| 19.9% |
| 90.3% |
| 19.1 | 47.1% | 33.6% | 69.2% |
| 18.6 | 47.0% | 40.8% | 79.2% |