86-89
FINALMilwaukee
Bucks
34-47|L10: 6-4
Memphis
Grizzlies
51-42|L10: 5-5
Milwaukee Bucks
Memphis Grizzlies
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62-20 | 0.756 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/9 | L 85-100 | |
| 2/5 |
| — |
| 2 | 56-24 | 0.700 | 5.0 |
| 3 | 56-25 | 0.691 | 5.5 |
| 4 | 51-30 | 0.630 | 10.5 |
| 5 | 43-37 | 0.537 | 18.0 |
| 6 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 20.0 |
| 7 | 39-41 | 0.487 | 22.0 |
| 8 | 37-43 | 0.463 | 24.0 |
| 9 | 99-136 | 0.421 | 39.5 |
| 10 | 34-47 | 0.420 | 27.5 |
| 11 | 29-51 | 0.362 | 32.0 |
| 12 | 22-59 | 0.272 | 39.5 |
| 13 | 22-59 | 0.272 | 39.5 |
| 14 | 19-62 | 0.235 | 42.5 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 21.0 |
| 2/3 | L 94-100 |
| 2/2 | L 77-92 |
| 1/31 | L 98-105 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/7 | L 84-93 | |
| 2/5 | L 93-95 | |
| 2/4 | W 112-105 | |
| 2/2 | W 102-84 | |
| 1/31 | W 100-97 |
| Category | MEM Offense | MIL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2183.6 ORtg | #4100.7 DRtg | MIL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #711.2% | #316.0% | MEM |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2733.1% | #433.6% | MIL |
| Category | MEM Defense | MIL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #9103.6 DRtg | #2580.6 ORtg | MIL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #116.6% | #811.2% | MEM |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1135.6% | #2233.8% | MIL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 16.2 | 37.2% | 31.0% | 72.5% |
| 14.0 | 40.0% | 39.2% | 67.6% |
| 12.8 | 48.4% | 0.0% | 39.3% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.1 | 49.5% | 8.7% | 73.1% | |
| 19.9 | 47.3% | 32.3% | 73.0% | |
| 14.0 | 43.6% | 33.1% | 59.7% |