84-111
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
52-35|L10: 5-5
Miami
Heat
24-57|L10: 3-7
Minnesota Timberwolves
Miami Heat
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-31 | 0.617 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/27 | L 107-110 | |
| 3/25 |
| — |
| 2 | 93-65 | 0.589 | -4.5 |
| 3 | 47-33 | 0.588 | 2.5 |
| 4 | 47-34 | 0.580 | 3.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 6.5 |
| 6 | 41-39 | 0.512 | 8.5 |
| 7 | 41-40 | 0.506 | 9.0 |
| 8 | 37-44 | 0.457 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 36-45 | 0.444 | 14.0 |
| 10 | 35-46 | 0.432 | 15.0 |
| 11 | 30-51 | 0.370 | 20.0 |
| 12 | 24-57 | 0.296 | 26.0 |
| 13 | 24-57 | 0.296 | 26.0 |
| 14 | 17-64 | 0.210 | 33.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 9.5 |
| 3/21 | W 101-94 |
| 3/18 | W 96-80 |
| 3/16 | W 111-95 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/26 | L 74-82 | |
| 3/25 | L 91-108 | |
| 3/23 | L 74-96 | |
| 3/21 | W 107-98 | |
| 3/19 | L 93-109 |
| Category | MIA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2575.4 ORtg | #15101.7 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1411.8% | #2613.5% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2531.7% | #1434.9% | MIN |
| Category | MIA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #9100.4 DRtg | #583.7 ORtg | MIA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1315.2% | #611.4% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1836.0% | #536.2% | MIA |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 23.2 | 50.7% | 14.2% | 70.4% | |
| 17.2 | 48.3% | 37.2% | 75.7% | |
| 15.0 | 41.2% | 31.8% | 70.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.5 | 41.8% | 40.5% | 74.6% | |
| 15.3 | 40.8% | 21.3% | 73.5% | |
| 10.4 | 50.3% | 0.0% | 53.7% |