78-89
FINALMinnesota
Timberwolves
51-35|L10: 4-6
Miami
Heat
58-34|L10: 6-4
Minnesota Timberwolves
Miami Heat
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56-26 | 0.683 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/27 | W 107-105 | |
| 12/23 |
| — |
| 2 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 4.0 |
| 3 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 7.0 |
| 5 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 7.0 |
| 6 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 11.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 15.0 |
| 10 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 21.0 |
| 11 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 24.0 |
| 12 | 31-51 | 0.378 | 25.0 |
| 13 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 39.0 |
| 12/22 | W 106-86 |
| 12/20 | W 100-94 |
| 12/18 | W 108-104 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/26 | L 85-93 | |
| 12/22 | W 74-72 | |
| 12/20 | W 92-89 | |
| 12/18 | L 89-106 | |
| 12/16 | L 95-96 |
| Category | MIA Offense | MIN Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1681.3 ORtg | #13102.0 DRtg | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1212.0% | #1614.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1136.2% | #1435.6% | MIA |
| Category | MIA Defense | MIN Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #398.5 DRtg | #783.9 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2114.2% | #511.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1536.0% | #737.6% | MIA |
| 22.7 | 50.7% | 21.7% | 62.8% | |
| 17.2 | 49.8% | 37.2% | 70.3% | |
| 11.4 | 45.5% | 14.3% | 56.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.7 | 53.9% | 0.0% | 70.8% | |
| 17.5 | 43.2% | 38.3% | 64.9% | |
| 12.7 | 35.1% | 31.0% | 58.3% |