101-108
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
17-65|L10: 2-8
Milwaukee
Bucks
33-49|L10: 3-7
Los Angeles Lakers
Milwaukee Bucks
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57-25 | 0.695 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/21 | L 115-126 | |
| 2/19 |
| — |
| 2 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 7 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 12.0 |
| 8 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 15.0 |
| 10 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 16.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 25.0 |
| 14 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 36.0 |
| 15 | 10-72 | 0.122 | 47.0 |
| 2/10 | L 111-120 |
| 2/8 | L 87-89 |
| 2/6 | L 102-106 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/20 | W 117-109 | |
| 2/19 | L 95-98 | |
| 2/11 | W 99-92 | |
| 2/9 | W 112-111 | |
| 2/5 | L 81-84 |
| Category | MIL Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2285.1 ORtg | #29110.2 DRtg | MIL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2612.6% | #2612.5% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2434.0% | #1335.0% | LAL |
| Category | MIL Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #24107.8 DRtg | #3081.2 ORtg | LAL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #915.2% | #710.9% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1535.2% | #2931.6% | LAL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 17.6 | 35.2% | 26.9% | 70.9% |
| 15.5 | 43.2% | 30.0% | 63.3% |
| 15.3 | 39.8% | 32.5% | 79.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.2 | 42.0% | 38.5% | 80.5% | |
| 16.9 | 50.1% | 16.8% | 68.5% | |
| 15.3 | 52.0% | 0.0% | 65.1% |