102-120
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
73-28|L10: 7-3
Minnesota
Timberwolves
50-35|L10: 4-6
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61-21 | 0.744 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/9 | W 109-90 | |
| 1/8 |
| 58-24 |
| 0.707 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 58-24 | 0.707 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 57-25 | 0.695 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 16.0 |
| 8 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 17.0 |
| 9 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 22.0 |
| 10 | 36-46 | 0.439 | 25.0 |
| 11 | 28-54 | 0.341 | 33.0 |
| 12 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 34.0 |
| 13 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 38.0 |
| 14 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 40.0 |
| 1/6 | W 109-89 |
| 1/4 | W 118-86 |
| 1/2 | W 87-86 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/9 | W 111-106 | |
| 1/7 | W 109-93 | |
| 1/5 | W 112-96 | |
| 1/4 | W 93-86 | |
| 1/2 | W 95-77 |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #983.4 ORtg | #599.3 DRtg | LAL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #511.0% | #2214.1% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #138.4% | #131.8% | Even |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #17103.6 DRtg | #884.1 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2413.4% | #210.2% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2637.7% | #1834.4% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.5 | 56.7% | 0.0% | 57.1% | |
| 25.5 | 46.7% | 18.7% | 81.9% | |
| 11.0 | 40.0% | 41.1% | 49.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.3 |
| 21.8% |
| 66.0% |
| 18.7 | 51.0% | 43.2% | 62.2% |
| 12.9 | 40.9% | 40.6% | 69.1% |