132-119
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
80-24|L10: 7-3
Minnesota
Timberwolves
24-57|L10: 4-6
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65-17 | 0.793 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/27 | L 110-117 | |
| 1/25 |
| 54-28 |
| 0.659 |
| 11.0 |
| 3 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 11.0 |
| 4 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 11.0 |
| 5 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 12.0 |
| 6 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 15.0 |
| 7 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 17.0 |
| 8 | 46-36 | 0.561 | 19.0 |
| 9 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 36.0 |
| 10 | 24-57 | 0.296 | 40.5 |
| 11 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 41.0 |
| 12 | 22-59 | 0.272 | 42.5 |
| 13 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 46.0 |
| 14 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 48.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 24.0 |
| 1/22 | W 117-97 |
| 1/21 | W 108-97 |
| 1/19 | W 105-88 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/28 | L 89-98 | |
| 1/26 | W 90-83 | |
| 1/25 | W 109-108 | |
| 1/23 | W 116-108 | |
| 1/20 | L 107-112 |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2582.2 ORtg | #4102.6 DRtg | LAL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1211.4% | #715.2% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2235.3% | #334.1% | LAL |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #24109.3 DRtg | #787.8 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2513.0% | #810.9% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2137.6% | #1736.1% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.6 | 46.9% | 33.8% | 81.7% | |
| 18.8 | 56.6% | 97.1% | 71.0% | |
| 11.8 | 50.7% | 0.0% | 59.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.1 |
| 49.3% |
| 0.0% |
| 71.4% |
| 16.5 | 40.6% | 31.5% | 72.0% |
| 13.3 | 41.7% | 34.7% | 57.1% |