96-114
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
32-47|L10: 3-7
Minnesota
Timberwolves
46-38|L10: 4-6
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 61-16 | 0.792 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/31 | L 142-148 | |
| 12/29 |
| 57-23 |
| 0.713 |
| 5.5 |
| 3 | 47-33 | 0.588 | 15.5 |
| 4 | 45-32 | 0.584 | 16.0 |
| 5 | 45-33 | 0.577 | 16.5 |
| 6 | 46-34 | 0.575 | 16.5 |
| 7 | 46-34 | 0.575 | 16.5 |
| 8 | 45-34 | 0.570 | 17.0 |
| 9 | 46-35 | 0.568 | 17.0 |
| 10 | 39-39 | 0.500 | 22.5 |
| 11 | 32-47 | 0.405 | 30.0 |
| 12 | 27-52 | 0.342 | 35.0 |
| 13 | 24-55 | 0.304 | 38.0 |
| 14 | 22-57 | 0.278 | 40.0 |
| 15 | 21-58 | 0.266 | 41.0 |
| 12/27 | L 99-109 |
| 12/25 | L 104-121 |
| 12/23 | L 92-95 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/31 | W 107-90 | |
| 12/28 | L 96-102 | |
| 12/27 | W 128-125 | |
| 12/25 | W 121-104 | |
| 12/23 | W 115-106 |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #792.2 ORtg | #14106.7 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #110.1% | #2213.2% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1036.4% | #634.8% | LAL |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #24109.5 DRtg | #2386.9 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #914.3% | #2712.4% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1636.5% | #2834.5% | LAL |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.4 | 37.9% | 26.9% | 79.5% | |
| 16.3 | 45.6% | 34.8% | 51.0% | |
| 16.3 | 56.3% | 8.3% | 62.6% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.7 |
| 34.7% |
| 77.6% |
| 21.0 | 53.7% | 38.0% | 78.2% |
| 17.4 | 43.8% | 29.5% | 53.6% |