100-94
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
19-58|L10: 2-8
Minnesota
Timberwolves
15-63|L10: 0-10
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64-14 | 0.821 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/12 | W 112-110 | |
| 12/9 |
| 55-24 |
| 0.696 |
| 9.5 |
| 3 | 54-24 | 0.692 | 10.0 |
| 4 | 53-24 | 0.688 | 10.5 |
| 5 | 53-25 | 0.679 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 49-30 | 0.620 | 15.5 |
| 7 | 48-31 | 0.608 | 16.5 |
| 8 | 44-35 | 0.557 | 20.5 |
| 9 | 43-35 | 0.551 | 21.0 |
| 10 | 35-42 | 0.455 | 28.5 |
| 11 | 34-43 | 0.442 | 29.5 |
| 12 | 28-50 | 0.359 | 36.0 |
| 13 | 27-52 | 0.342 | 37.5 |
| 14 | 19-58 | 0.247 | 44.5 |
| 15 | 15-63 | 0.192 | 49.0 |
| 12/7 | L 87-104 |
| 12/5 | L 96-113 |
| 12/3 | L 95-111 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/12 | L 92-111 | |
| 12/10 | W 90-82 | |
| 12/8 | L 86-102 | |
| 12/6 | L 101-123 | |
| 12/5 | L 112-114 |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2681.2 ORtg | #28108.5 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1911.9% |
LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2632.4% | #2436.0% | Even |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #29110.7 DRtg | #2382.1 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #715.2% | #210.4% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2836.9% | #1634.5% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.9 | 37.3% | 26.2% | 86.6% | |
| 13.7 | 35.5% | 35.3% | 72.8% | |
| 12.5 | 42.2% | 22.4% | 64.1% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.8 |
| 41.0% |
| 38.2% |
| 83.3% |
| 16.8 | 42.5% | 20.0% | 69.1% |
| 14.4 | 45.9% | 23.9% | 51.7% |