111-118
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
50-37|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
64-33|L10: 3-7
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55-24 | 0.696 | — | |
| 2 | 54-24 | 0.692 | 0.5 | |
| 3 | 55-26 | 0.679 | 1.0 | |
| 4 | 50-28 | 0.641 | 4.5 | |
| 5 | 49-31 | 0.613 | 6.5 | |
| 6 | 47-32 | 0.595 | 8.0 | |
| 7 | 47-32 | 0.595 | 8.0 | |
| 8 | 48-33 | 0.593 | 8.0 | |
| 9 | 44-34 | 0.564 | 10.5 | |
| 10 | 44-34 | 0.564 | 10.5 | |
| 11 | 41-39 | 0.512 | 14.5 | |
| 12 | 30-50 | 0.375 | 25.5 | |
| 13 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 29.5 | |
| 14 | 22-56 | 0.282 | 32.5 | |
| 15 | 21-60 | 0.259 | 35.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/20 | L 108-124 | |
| 12/18 | L 109-114 | |
| 12/15 | L 115-129 | |
| 12/13 | W 122-119 | |
| 12/12 | L 125-127 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/20 | L 113-127 | |
| 12/18 | W 112-108 | |
| 12/16 | W 127-109 | |
| 12/14 | W 119-101 | |
| 12/11 | L 107-121 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.7 | 53.9% | 39.1% | 74.2% | |
| 25.0 | 56.1% | 16.3% | 78.8% | |
| 17.7 | 43.9% | 36.7% | 56.9% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.5 | 45.8% | 35.2% | 80.0% | |
| 21.1 | 50.1% | 41.3% | 80.6% | |
| 13.6 | 65.8% | 0.0% | 58.5% |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #995.5 ORtg | #16112.9 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1911.1% | #2212.2% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #138.2% | #2137.0% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #1107.9 DRtg | #498.3 ORtg | LAL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #513.6% | #1811.1% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1135.9% | #937.2% | Even |