112-104
FINALLos
Angeles Lakers
45-34|L10: 6-4
Minnesota
Timberwolves
23-49|L10: 5-5
Los Angeles Lakers
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 52-20 | 0.722 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/14 | L 105-122 | |
| 2/12 |
| 51-21 |
| 0.708 |
| 1.0 |
| 3 | 47-25 | 0.653 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 47-25 | 0.653 | 5.0 |
| 5 | 43-30 | 0.589 | 9.5 |
| 6 | 42-30 | 0.583 | 10.0 |
| 7 | 42-30 | 0.583 | 10.0 |
| 8 | 40-34 | 0.541 | 13.0 |
| 9 | 39-35 | 0.527 | 14.0 |
| 10 | 33-40 | 0.452 | 19.5 |
| 11 | 31-41 | 0.431 | 21.0 |
| 12 | 31-41 | 0.431 | 21.0 |
| 13 | 23-49 | 0.319 | 29.0 |
| 14 | 22-50 | 0.306 | 30.0 |
| 15 | 17-55 | 0.236 | 35.0 |
| 2/10 | W 114-113 |
| 2/8 | W 119-112 |
| 2/6 | W 135-129 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/14 | W 116-112 | |
| 2/12 | L 114-120 | |
| 2/10 | L 112-119 | |
| 2/8 | L 122-127 | |
| 2/6 | L 118-120 |
| Category | MIN Offense | LAL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #21821.3 ORtg | #2739.7 DRtg | LAL |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #21100.0% | #7100.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #210.0% | #20.0% | LAL |
| Category | MIN Defense | LAL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #7798.6 DRtg | #28745.7 ORtg | LAL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #20100.0% | #6100.0% | LAL |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #210.0% | #20.0% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.8 | - | - | - | |
| 21.4 | - | - | - | |
| 15.3 | - | - | - |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.8 |
| - |
| - |
| 19.6 | - | - | - |
| 19.3 | - | - | - |