101-105
FINALMiami
Heat
58-49|L10: 3-7
Minnesota
Timberwolves
44-45|L10: 5-5
Miami Heat
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58-24 | 0.707 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/20 | L 87-113 | |
| 11/18 |
| — |
| 2 | 57-25 | 0.695 | 1.0 |
| 3 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 7.0 |
| 5 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 13.0 |
| 7 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 9 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 10 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 18.0 |
| 11 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 23.0 |
| 12 | 35-47 | 0.427 | 23.0 |
| 13 | 34-48 | 0.415 | 24.0 |
| 14 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 31.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 41.0 |
| 11/16 | L 104-112 |
| 11/14 | W 113-112 |
| 11/12 | W 132-115 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/19 | W 112-109 | |
| 11/16 | W 126-108 | |
| 11/13 | W 129-124 | |
| 11/11 | L 103-114 | |
| 11/9 | L 117-129 |
| Category | MIN Offense | MIA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #12103.9 ORtg | #2116.6 DRtg | MIA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2913.4% | #615.6% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #737.1% | #935.5% | Even |
| Category | MIN Defense | MIA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #11121.3 DRtg | #2798.1 ORtg | MIA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #815.4% | #711.1% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2537.1% | #2235.1% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.0 | 51.6% | 29.9% | 78.6% | |
| 20.0 | 43.7% | 33.9% | 72.0% | |
| 19.6 | 53.0% | 1.1% | 71.9% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.8 |
| 34.2% |
| 72.9% |
| 20.7 | 49.2% | 38.9% | 65.4% |
| 17.9 | 47.4% | 41.2% | 64.3% |