95-94
FINALMiami
Heat
39-49|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
58-39|L10: 5-5
Miami Heat
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64-18 | 0.780 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/8 | L 122-135 | |
| 11/6 |
| — |
| 2 | 61-21 | 0.744 | 3.0 |
| 3 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 13.0 |
| 4 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 14.0 |
| 5 | 49-34 | 0.590 | 15.5 |
| 6 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 20.0 |
| 7 | 42-41 | 0.506 | 22.5 |
| 8 | 40-44 | 0.476 | 25.0 |
| 9 | 39-44 | 0.470 | 25.5 |
| 10 | 39-45 | 0.464 | 26.0 |
| 11 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 34.0 |
| 12 | 26-56 | 0.317 | 38.0 |
| 13 | 24-58 | 0.293 | 40.0 |
| 14 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 45.0 |
| 15 | 18-64 | 0.220 | 46.0 |
| 11/4 | L 110-111 |
| 11/2 | W 118-98 |
| 10/30 | L 107-116 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 11/8 | W 127-102 | |
| 11/7 | W 135-119 | |
| 11/4 | W 114-93 | |
| 11/2 | L 103-113 | |
| 11/1 | W 119-116 |
| Category | MIN Offense | MIA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #19819.0 ORtg | #17874.3 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #20100.0% |
MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #210.0% | #160.0% | MIA |
| Category | MIN Defense | MIA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #8791.5 DRtg | #12859.2 ORtg | MIA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2100.0% | #16100.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #210.0% | #160.0% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 23.8 | - | - | - |
| 18.0 | - | - | - |
| 17.8 | - | - | - |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.2 | - | - | - | |
| 19.2 | - | - | - | |
| 13.6 | - | - | - |