101-102
FINALMiami
Heat
36-45|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
15-63|L10: 0-10
Miami Heat
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56-22 | 0.718 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/3 | L 91-108 | |
| 2/1 |
| — |
| 2 | 50-27 | 0.649 | 5.5 |
| 3 | 50-28 | 0.641 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 49-31 | 0.613 | 8.0 |
| 5 | 43-34 | 0.558 | 12.5 |
| 6 | 39-39 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 7 | 37-42 | 0.468 | 19.5 |
| 8 | 37-42 | 0.468 | 19.5 |
| 9 | 36-45 | 0.444 | 21.5 |
| 10 | 64-91 | 0.413 | 30.5 |
| 11 | 30-49 | 0.380 | 26.5 |
| 12 | 25-53 | 0.321 | 31.0 |
| 13 | 18-60 | 0.231 | 38.0 |
| 14 | 16-61 | 0.208 | 39.5 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 17.0 |
| 1/30 | L 72-93 |
| 1/27 | L 102-109 |
| 1/25 | W 96-84 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/2 | L 94-100 | |
| 1/31 | L 90-106 | |
| 1/30 | L 94-103 | |
| 1/28 | W 110-98 | |
| 1/26 | L 84-92 |
| Category | MIN Offense | MIA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2681.2 ORtg | #22105.3 DRtg | MIA |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1911.9% | #915.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2632.4% | #2035.5% | MIA |
| Category | MIN Defense | MIA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #29110.7 DRtg | #985.6 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #715.2% | #2512.6% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2836.9% | #2233.9% | MIN |
| 21.5 | 47.5% | 19.0% | 72.2% |
| 21.1 | 46.0% | 35.2% | 71.5% |
| 17.0 | 50.1% | 31.0% | 70.7% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.8 | 41.0% | 38.2% | 83.3% | |
| 16.8 | 42.5% | 20.0% | 69.1% | |
| 14.4 | 45.9% | 23.9% | 51.7% |