126-123
FINALOklahoma
City Thunder
66-34|L10: 6-4
Minnesota
Timberwolves
29-53|L10: 5-5
Oklahoma City Thunder
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 73-9 | 0.890 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/26 | W 128-122 | |
| 1/24 |
| 66-15 |
| 0.815 |
| 6.5 |
| 3 | 55-27 | 0.671 | 18.0 |
| 4 | 52-29 | 0.642 | 20.5 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 29.0 |
| 6 | 42-39 | 0.519 | 30.5 |
| 7 | 41-40 | 0.506 | 31.5 |
| 8 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 32.0 |
| 9 | 39-42 | 0.481 | 33.5 |
| 10 | 33-48 | 0.407 | 39.5 |
| 11 | 32-49 | 0.395 | 40.5 |
| 12 | 30-52 | 0.366 | 43.0 |
| 13 | 29-53 | 0.354 | 44.0 |
| 14 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 50.0 |
| 15 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 56.0 |
| 1/22 | W 109-106 |
| 1/20 | W 109-95 |
| 1/19 | W 110-104 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/25 | L 107-114 | |
| 1/23 | W 106-101 | |
| 1/20 | L 94-106 | |
| 1/19 | L 99-114 | |
| 1/17 | W 117-87 |
| Category | MIN Offense | OKC Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1386.6 ORtg | #10103.5 DRtg | OKC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2312.2% | #2612.5% | OKC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2633.6% | #1034.7% | OKC |
| Category | MIN Defense | OKC Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #27107.9 DRtg | #1087.3 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1214.5% | #2012.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1735.7% | #1834.5% | Even |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28.2 | 50.5% | 38.0% | 88.0% | |
| 23.9 | 45.0% | 27.5% | 79.1% | |
| 12.5 | 48.0% | 30.2% | 40.9% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.7 |
| 24.4% |
| 73.6% |
| 18.3 | 54.5% | 21.9% | 66.6% |
| 14.0 | 42.6% | 34.4% | 55.6% |