127-120
FINALOrlando
Magic
29-45|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
39-42|L10: 5-5
Orlando Magic
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51-21 | 0.708 | — | |
| 2 | 54-24 | 0.692 | — | |
| 3 | 48-26 | 0.649 | 4.0 | |
| 4 | 47-26 | 0.644 | 4.5 | |
| 5 | 43-33 | 0.566 | 10.0 | |
| 6 | 40-32 | 0.556 | 11.0 | |
| 7 | 38-34 | 0.528 | 13.0 | |
| 8 | 39-37 | 0.513 | 14.0 | |
| 9 | 37-37 | 0.500 | 15.0 | |
| 10 | 32-41 | 0.438 | 19.5 | |
| 11 | 61-81 | 0.430 | 25.0 | |
| 12 | 30-43 | 0.411 | 21.5 | |
| 13 | 29-45 | 0.392 | 23.0 | |
| 14 | 16-57 | 0.219 | 35.5 | |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 15.0 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/1 | L 94-105 | |
| 1/30 | W 119-109 | |
| 1/28 | L 109-128 | |
| 1/27 | L 105-110 | |
| 1/25 | W 126-120 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/1 | W 119-114 | |
| 1/30 | L 111-118 | |
| 1/28 | W 117-110 | |
| 1/27 | W 111-100 | |
| 1/25 | W 111-102 |
| Category | MIN Offense | ORL Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #795.8 ORtg | #16113.1 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2912.3% | #1013.7% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #737.1% | #1335.9% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | ORL Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #13112.2 DRtg | #2291.7 ORtg | ORL |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #514.1% | #2411.6% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2437.1% | #2135.1% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19.6 | 41.7% | 26.7% | 72.2% | |
| 18.8 | 48.7% | 36.0% | 72.7% | |
| 15.3 | 51.4% | 38.2% | 65.9% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.2 | 45.5% | 35.8% | 70.9% | |
| 20.9 | 51.8% | 39.0% | 74.6% | |
| 18.1 | 46.7% | 37.5% | 61.7% |