88-117
FINALSacramento
Kings
58-32|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
48-38|L10: 3-7
Sacramento Kings
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58-24 | 0.707 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/6 | L 109-112 | |
| 2/4 |
| 56-26 |
| 0.683 |
| 2.0 |
| 3 | 55-27 | 0.671 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 5.0 |
| 5 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 5.0 |
| 6 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 7.0 |
| 7 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 8.0 |
| 8 | 47-35 | 0.573 | 11.0 |
| 9 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 13.0 |
| 10 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 14.0 |
| 11 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 18.0 |
| 12 | 31-51 | 0.378 | 27.0 |
| 13 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 35.0 |
| 14 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 41.0 |
| 2/2 | W 105-95 |
| 1/30 | W 105-79 |
| 1/27 | W 101-89 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 2/3 | W 108-105 | |
| 2/1 | W 90-81 | |
| 1/31 | W 96-83 | |
| 1/29 | W 99-96 | |
| 1/27 | W 93-80 |
| Category | MIN Offense | SAC Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1081.6 ORtg | #698.0 DRtg | SAC |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #611.3% | #715.9% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1235.2% | #834.5% | SAC |
| Category | MIN Defense | SAC Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #12101.1 DRtg | #1181.6 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1215.3% | #911.8% | SAC |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1835.8% | #1335.1% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 26.7 | 46.9% | 2.7% | 64.0% |
Peja Stojaković | 20.5 | - | - | - |
| 20.5 | 45.8% | 36.8% | 76.0% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.0 | 48.4% | 17.3% | 75.8% | |
| 16.0 | 43.8% | 22.5% | 70.9% | |
| 14.0 | 50.6% | 13.8% | 64.6% |