96-106
FINALSan
Antonio Spurs
60-19|L10: 7-3
Minnesota
Timberwolves
26-40|L10: 1-9
San Antonio Spurs
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50-16 | 0.758 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/31 | W 104-89 | |
| 12/29 |
| 47-19 |
| 0.712 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 41-25 | 0.621 | 9.0 |
| 5 | 40-26 | 0.606 | 10.0 |
| 6 | 38-28 | 0.576 | 12.0 |
| 7 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 8 | 36-30 | 0.545 | 14.0 |
| 9 | 34-32 | 0.515 | 16.0 |
| 10 | 33-33 | 0.500 | 17.0 |
| 11 | 28-38 | 0.424 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 26-40 | 0.394 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 23-43 | 0.348 | 27.0 |
| 14 | 22-44 | 0.333 | 28.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 17.0 |
| 12/28 | W 115-90 |
| 12/26 | W 95-82 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/1 | W 99-82 | |
| 12/30 | L 101-103 | |
| 12/27 | L 95-98 | |
| 12/26 | L 100-104 |
| Category | MIN Offense | SAS Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1881.7 ORtg | #10101.8 DRtg | SAS |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2112.2% | #2313.6% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2133.4% | #2035.7% | Even |
| Category | MIN Defense | SAS Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #19104.5 DRtg | #289.7 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2513.3% | #911.6% | SAS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #633.9% | #140.2% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18.6 | 46.1% | 13.1% | 73.2% | |
| 15.8 | 49.2% | 0.0% | 66.9% | |
| 12.9 | 49.0% | 35.5% | 66.8% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.0 |
| 32.8% |
| 81.2% |
| 14.5 | 58.0% | 0.0% | 64.8% |
| 12.1 | 43.0% | 26.0% | 68.7% |