111-99
FINALSan
Antonio Spurs
73-30|L10: 7-3
Minnesota
Timberwolves
52-35|L10: 5-5
San Antonio Spurs
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 59-22 | 0.728 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/11 | W 105-102 | |
| 3/9 |
| 58-22 |
| 0.725 |
| 0.5 |
| 3 | 57-23 | 0.713 | 1.5 |
| 4 | 50-30 | 0.625 | 8.5 |
| 5 | 50-31 | 0.617 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 9.5 |
| 7 | 46-35 | 0.568 | 13.0 |
| 8 | 44-37 | 0.543 | 15.0 |
| 9 | 43-38 | 0.531 | 16.0 |
| 10 | 40-41 | 0.494 | 19.0 |
| 11 | 37-44 | 0.457 | 22.0 |
| 12 | 28-53 | 0.346 | 31.0 |
| 13 | 27-55 | 0.329 | 32.5 |
| 14 | 17-65 | 0.207 | 42.5 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 18.5 |
| 3/6 | W 92-78 |
| 3/4 | L 97-104 |
| 3/2 | W 97-88 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/10 | W 92-83 | |
| 3/9 | W 105-98 | |
| 3/7 | L 96-106 | |
| 3/5 | L 95-96 | |
| 3/4 | L 83-92 |
| Category | MIN Offense | SAS Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #583.7 ORtg | #197.6 DRtg | SAS |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #611.4% | #815.5% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #536.2% | #1034.1% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | SAS Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #15101.7 DRtg | #783.2 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2613.5% | #2213.0% | SAS |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1434.9% | #1135.3% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|
| 23.7 | 52.5% | 5.9% | 69.7% |
| 15.4 | 44.7% | 28.5% | 57.4% |
| 12.2 | 41.4% | 23.7% | 57.4% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.2 | 50.7% | 14.2% | 70.4% | |
| 17.2 | 48.3% | 37.2% | 75.7% | |
| 15.0 | 41.2% | 31.8% | 70.2% |