103-110
FINALUtah
Jazz
60-39|L10: 5-5
Minnesota
Timberwolves
32-50|L10: 2-8
Utah Jazz
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67-15 | 0.817 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/4 | W 101-88 | |
| 12/2 |
| 61-20 |
| 0.753 |
| 5.5 |
| 3 | 58-24 | 0.707 | 9.0 |
| 4 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 15.0 |
| 5 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 16.0 |
| 6 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 22.0 |
| 7 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 25.0 |
| 8 | 41-40 | 0.506 | 25.5 |
| 9 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 27.0 |
| 10 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 34.0 |
| 11 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 35.0 |
| 12 | 32-50 | 0.390 | 35.0 |
| 13 | 31-51 | 0.378 | 36.0 |
| 14 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 45.0 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 26.0 |
| 11/30 | L 102-132 |
| 11/29 | W 83-75 |
| 11/27 | L 75-88 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 12/6 | W 90-84 | |
| 12/3 | W 95-84 | |
| 12/1 | L 92-106 | |
| 11/28 | L 75-82 | |
| 11/27 | L 87-93 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.6 | 55.1% | 0.0% | 61.8% | |
| 16.7 | 44.5% | 29.5% | 64.5% | |
| 16.5 | 44.5% | 35.0% | 66.7% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.4 |
| 10.5% |
| 81.7% |
| 17.0 | 45.0% | 34.6% | 66.7% |
| 12.3 | 50.6% | 7.1% | 53.9% |
| Category | MIN Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1783.9 ORtg | #14104.8 DRtg | UTA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2113.0% | #715.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1435.2% | #935.4% | UTA |
| Category | MIN Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #21106.2 DRtg | #1384.4 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2414.6% | #1512.7% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #835.1% | #2633.9% | UTA |