126-125
FINALUtah
Jazz
37-45|L10: 2-8
Minnesota
Timberwolves
44-45|L10: 5-5
Utah Jazz
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 53-29 | 0.646 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/14 | L 117-118 | |
| 1/13 | W 112-108 |
| 51-31 |
| 0.622 |
| 2.0 |
| 3 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 5.0 |
| 4 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 8.0 |
| 5 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 6 | 44-38 | 0.537 | 9.0 |
| 7 | 43-39 | 0.524 | 10.0 |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 11.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 11.0 |
| 10 | 40-42 | 0.488 | 13.0 |
| 11 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 15.0 |
| 12 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 16.0 |
| 13 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 20.0 |
| 14 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 31.0 |
| 15 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 31.0 |
| 1/10 | W 116-114 |
| 1/8 | L 118-123 |
| 1/7 | L 118-126 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/14 | W 110-102 | |
| 1/13 | W 121-116 | |
| 1/11 | L 118-135 | |
| 1/8 | W 104-96 | |
| 1/6 | W 128-115 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25.6 | 50.4% | 9.7% | 81.4% | |
| 20.8 | 44.1% | 6.6% | 82.9% | |
| 14.6 | 49.6% | 9.2% | 73.1% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.8 |
| 14.8% |
| 72.9% |
| 20.7 | 49.2% | 17.8% | 65.4% |
| 17.9 | 47.4% | 18.1% | 64.3% |
| Category | MIN Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #12103.7 ORtg | #24125.2 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #2913.3% | #2912.8% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #937.0% | #1536.0% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #10121.0 DRtg | #19100.8 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #715.3% | #2412.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2537.2% | #1935.4% | MIN |