125-111
FINALUtah
Jazz
51-36|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
36-46|L10: 4-6
Utah Jazz
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57-25 | 0.695 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/25 | W 106-102 | |
| 1/23 |
| 54-28 |
| 0.659 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 7.0 |
| 6 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 8.0 |
| 7 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 8 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 9 | 39-43 | 0.476 | 18.0 |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 20.0 |
| 11 | 36-46 | 0.439 | 21.0 |
| 12 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 24.0 |
| 13 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 24.0 |
| 14 | 33-49 | 0.402 | 24.0 |
| 15 | 19-63 | 0.232 | 38.0 |
| 1/21 | L 104-109 |
| 1/18 | W 115-99 |
| 1/16 | W 129-109 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 1/25 | L 102-106 | |
| 1/24 | W 120-105 | |
| 1/22 | W 118-91 | |
| 1/20 | W 116-114 | |
| 1/18 | L 113-116 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23.6 | 41.7% | 35.3% | 71.3% | |
| 15.7 | 65.5% | 0.0% | 61.2% | |
| 13.1 | 38.6% | 26.5% | 71.2% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24.4 |
| 40.7% |
| 82.6% |
| 21.3 | 41.9% | 27.7% | 75.0% |
| 18.3 | 46.8% | 24.5% | 67.8% |
| Category | MIN Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1590.2 ORtg | #2105.1 DRtg | UTA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #310.0% | #1413.3% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #1635.1% | #1435.5% | Even |
| Category | MIN Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #23112.0 DRtg | #991.7 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1014.0% | #2712.1% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2837.9% | #1535.2% | MIN |