96-89
FINALUtah
Jazz
45-40|L10: 3-7
Minnesota
Timberwolves
49-35|L10: 4-6
Utah Jazz
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60-21 | 0.741 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/15 | W 100-97 | |
| 3/14 |
| 57-24 |
| 0.704 |
| 3.0 |
| 3 | 57-24 | 0.704 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 56-25 | 0.691 | 4.0 |
| 5 | 49-32 | 0.605 | 11.0 |
| 6 | 49-32 | 0.605 | 11.0 |
| 7 | 45-36 | 0.556 | 15.0 |
| 8 | 44-37 | 0.543 | 16.0 |
| 9 | 39-42 | 0.481 | 21.0 |
| 10 | 36-45 | 0.444 | 24.0 |
| 11 | 27-54 | 0.333 | 33.0 |
| 12 | 26-55 | 0.321 | 34.0 |
| 13 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 37.5 |
| 14 | 21-61 | 0.256 | 39.5 |
| 15 | 0-0 | 0.000 | 19.5 |
| 3/11 | L 78-79 |
| 3/10 | L 92-95 |
| 3/8 | L 79-85 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/15 | L 85-98 | |
| 3/13 | L 95-96 | |
| 3/11 | L 99-108 | |
| 3/8 | L 76-81 | |
| 3/6 | L 78-85 |
| Category | MIN Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #983.4 ORtg | #11101.9 DRtg | Even |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #511.0% |
MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #138.4% | #2738.0% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #17103.6 DRtg | #1979.6 ORtg | Even |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #2413.4% | #2713.0% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #2637.7% | #2332.9% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22.3 | 45.8% | 7.8% | 79.6% | |
| 14.8 | 48.2% | 16.9% | 60.0% | |
| 13.3 | 52.9% | 20.7% | 81.9% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.4 |
| 21.9% |
| 66.6% |
| 18.8 | 50.6% | 42.6% | 61.9% |
| 12.8 | 40.7% | 39.7% | 69.4% |