103-110
FINALUtah
Jazz
60-34|L10: 4-6
Minnesota
Timberwolves
22-60|L10: 3-7
Utah Jazz
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 57-25 | 0.695 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/28 | W 121-101 | |
| 3/25 |
| 56-26 |
| 0.683 |
| 1.0 |
| 3 | 56-26 | 0.683 | 1.0 |
| 4 | 55-27 | 0.671 | 2.0 |
| 5 | 55-27 | 0.671 | 2.0 |
| 6 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 3.0 |
| 7 | 51-31 | 0.622 | 6.0 |
| 8 | 50-32 | 0.610 | 7.0 |
| 9 | 48-34 | 0.585 | 9.0 |
| 10 | 41-41 | 0.500 | 16.0 |
| 11 | 38-44 | 0.463 | 19.0 |
| 12 | 23-59 | 0.280 | 34.0 |
| 13 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 35.0 |
| 14 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 35.0 |
| 15 | 20-62 | 0.244 | 37.0 |
| 3/22 | W 115-101 |
| 3/20 | L 95-106 |
| 3/17 | W 96-79 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/28 | L 84-99 | |
| 3/26 | L 86-97 | |
| 3/22 | W 114-93 | |
| 3/21 | L 113-124 | |
| 3/19 | W 98-94 |
| Category | MIN Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #2482.4 ORtg | #16107.3 DRtg | UTA |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1511.9% | #715.8% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #2334.4% | #1636.2% | UTA |
| Category | MIN Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #26110.3 DRtg | #889.8 ORtg | MIN |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1914.1% | #1711.9% | Even |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #1536.0% | #937.5% | MIN |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20.4 | 52.2% | 0.0% | 71.5% | |
| 19.2 | 50.1% | 35.5% | 72.1% | |
| 14.7 | 43.4% | 35.4% | 68.1% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21.0 |
| 50.0% |
| 0.0% |
| 66.4% |
| 15.1 | 45.6% | 37.6% | 45.1% |
| 13.1 | 42.6% | 36.4% | 43.1% |