111-147
FINALUtah
Jazz
22-60|L10: 1-9
Minnesota
Timberwolves
55-39|L10: 5-5
Utah Jazz
Minnesota Timberwolves
| # | Team | W-L | Pct | GB |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64-18 | 0.780 | — | |
| 2 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/15 | L 111-116 | |
| 3/13 | L 114-124 |
| 62-21 |
| 0.747 |
| 2.5 |
| 3 | 54-28 | 0.659 | 10.0 |
| 4 | 53-29 | 0.646 | 11.0 |
| 5 | 52-30 | 0.634 | 12.0 |
| 6 | 49-33 | 0.598 | 15.0 |
| 7 | 45-37 | 0.549 | 19.0 |
| 8 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 22.0 |
| 9 | 42-40 | 0.512 | 22.0 |
| 10 | 37-45 | 0.451 | 27.0 |
| 11 | 26-56 | 0.317 | 38.0 |
| 12 | 26-56 | 0.317 | 38.0 |
| 13 | 25-57 | 0.305 | 39.0 |
| 14 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 42.0 |
| 15 | 22-60 | 0.268 | 42.0 |
| 3/11 | L 117-134 |
| 3/9 | W 119-116 |
| 3/7 | L 99-113 |
| Opponent | Date | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 3/17 | W 116-104 | |
| 3/15 | L 103-116 | |
| 3/13 | W 127-117 | |
| 3/11 | L 128-153 | |
| 3/10 | L 106-120 |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26.7 | 47.5% | 36.6% | 86.5% | |
| 23.6 | 44.7% | 34.8% | 86.8% | |
| 22.3 | 50.4% | 34.0% | 90.5% |
| Player | PointsPPG | FG% | 3P% | FT% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27.7 |
| 34.1% |
| 65.8% |
| 20.3 | 41.3% | 24.6% | 68.1% |
| 14.8 | 43.6% | 35.4% | 49.0% |
| Category | MIN Offense | UTA Defense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints scored per 100 possessions | #1092.8 ORtg | #30119.8 DRtg | MIN |
Turnover RateLower offensive turnovers vs defensive forced turnovers | #1511.2% | #1913.4% | UTA |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter efficiency vs perimeter defense | #636.7% | #2637.1% | MIN |
| Category | MIN Defense | UTA Offense | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
Offensive RatingPoints allowed per 100 possessions | #6109.8 DRtg | #1791.2 ORtg | UTA |
Turnover RateDefensive takeaways vs offensive giveaways | #1713.7% | #2211.7% | MIN |
3P% vs AllowedPerimeter defense vs perimeter shooting | #434.8% | #2434.6% | UTA |